Research standards

How we check provider information.

Our job is to make public facts easier to compare without turning uncertainty into a claim. Every published fact should have a source, a checked date, and an honest evidence state.

Last updated September 19, 2026

What we research

We research organization identity, named professionals when publicly identified, service descriptions, delivery method, geographic statements, staged review fees, published service prices, refund or credit policies, turnaround claims, and other material purchase terms.

The source order

  1. Official public records: state licensing boards and government registries.
  2. Provider-controlled primary sources: current pricing pages, policies, service pages, and written submissions from an authorized representative.
  3. Other sources: used to locate a lead or identify a conflict, not to silently replace stronger primary evidence.

Identity is not the same as eligibility

We may use the federal NPI system to help match a person or organization. An NPI is an identifier—not proof of current licensure, credentials, service eligibility, or quality. CMS states that NPI issuance does not validate licensure or credentialing.

How evidence labels work

Independently checked
A NexProviders reviewer matched the fact to a named source and recorded when it was checked.
Provider-claimed
An authorized provider representative supplied the information, but independent confirmation may not be available.
Conflicting
Current sources disagree. We show the conflict instead of choosing a convenient answer.
Stale
The latest available source is older than the review interval for that fact.
Unknown
We did not find enough reliable evidence to publish a value.

How we present pricing

A listed starting price is not automatically the amount someone must spend. When a provider publishes a required records-review fee, we show that stage separately and calculate a minimum known spend only when the required published amounts can be combined safely.

Custom quotes, conditional charges, extra-page fees, examinations, consultations, and unknown terms remain visible as conditions or unknowns. We do not invent an all-in total.

Ranking and commercial independence

Payment, provider participation, corrections, or a future marketplace relationship cannot purchase organic rank, a favorable fact, an evidence label, or removal of accurate information. Directory publication and future marketplace readiness are separate decisions.

Limits of the research

  • Public records and provider websites can be incomplete, delayed, or wrong.
  • A checked license does not establish fit for a particular service, veteran, state, or claim.
  • A named owner or clinical leader may not be the professional assigned to a future engagement.
  • NexProviders does not test clinical opinions or grade likely VA outcomes.

Corrections and challenges

Anyone can flag a factual problem. Providers do not need to pay or join a marketplace to request review. See our correction process for what to send and what happens next.

Claims help is a different service

NexProviders is not a VA-accredited representative and does not prepare, present, or prosecute benefit claims. Veterans seeking claims assistance can use the VA’s official accredited representative search.